A Legacy of Legal Victories in Fraud & White Collar Crime Defense

Brent E. Newton, Of Counsel at Cogdell Law Firm
Of Counsel

Brent E. Newton

  • Criminal Law
  • Health Care Fraud Defense

Education

Columbia Law SchoolNew York, New York

  • J.D. — 1992
  • Honors: Kent Scholar
  • Honors: Stone Scholar
  • Columbia Law Review, Senior Editor

University of North CarolinaChapel Hill, North Carolina

  • B.A.
  • Honors: Phi Beta Kappa
  • Honors: With Highest Honors

Classes & Seminars

  • “Hot Topics in the Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence” — Federal Public Defender’s Office / CLE for CJA Panel Attorneys; Phoenix, AZ; March 2020
  • Annual or biannual presentations on legal ethics, immigration offenses, firearms offenses, child pornography offenses, and federal supervised release — U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Annual National Seminars on the Sentencing Guidelines; 2007–2019
  • “Sentencing in Securities Fraud Cases” — ABA’s Fifth Annual Institute on Securities Fraud; New Orleans, LA; October 2010
  • Annual presentations on federal habeas corpus practice, mental health issues in criminal law, federal pretrial motions practice, and federal sentencing issues — Advanced Criminal Law Course (State Bar of Texas); 1999, 2002, 2005, 2007–2009, 2011
  • Regular presentations on firearms offenses, immigration offenses, pretrial motions practice, and Title III wiretaps — “Winning Strategies” Seminars (Defender Services Division, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts); 2002–2009

Published Works

  • Trial Advocacy in Action (NITA/LEXIS 2015)
  • Practical Criminal Procedure: A Constitutional Manual (4th ed., NITA/LEXIS 2021)
  • Criminal Litigation and Legal Issues in Criminal Procedure (5th ed., NITA/Wolters Kluwer 2023)
  • Incentivizing Ineffective-Assistance-of-Counsel Claims Raised on Direct Appeal: Why Appellate Courts Should Remand “Colorable” Claims for Evidentiary Hearings, 22 J. App. Prac. & Process 107 (2022)
  • A Partial Fix of a Broken Guideline: A Proposed Amendment to Section 2G2.2 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, 70 Case Western Reserve L. Rev. 53 (2020)
  • Recurring Ethical Issues Related to Federal Sentencing, 43 J. of the Legal Prof. 25 (2018)
  • The History of the Original United States Sentencing Commission, 1985–87, 45 Hofstra L. Rev. 1167 (2017) (co-authored with Dawinder Sidhu)
  • The Supreme Court’s Fourth Amendment Scorecard, 13 Stanford Journal of Civ. Rts. & Civ. Liberties 1 (2017)
  • The Real-World Fourth Amendment, 43 Hastings Const. L. Quarterly 759 (2016)
  • The Story of Federal Probation, 53 Amer. Crim. L. Rev. 311 (2016)
  • Three chapters — Mental Health Issues in Federal Criminal Practice, Pretrial Statements, and Constitutional Issues that Arise During Trial — in Defending a Federal Criminal Case (2010)
  • Four entries — Retroactivity, The Eighth Amendment, Substantive Due Process, and Professional Baseball Cases — in The Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States (Macmillan Reference USA 2008)

Bar Admissions

  • Texas
  • Florida
  • Washington
  • Maryland
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Honors

  • Elected Member, American Law Institute, 2010
  • Martindale-Hubbell “AV Preeminent” Rating
  • Student Bar Association’s “Adjunct Professor of the Year,” 2013–2014, Washington College of Law, American University
  • Student Bar Association’s “Adjunct Professor of the Year,” 2008–2009, University of Houston Law Center
  • Named “Outstanding Assistant Federal Defender, 2006” (one of four nationally) by the National Association of Federal Defenders
  • Harry S. Truman Scholar, 1987

Confidential

Schedule YourConsultation.

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer.

To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call the firm or complete the intake form below.

All fields required

Attorney-client privilege applies from your first communication with us.

The Cogdell Law Firm team in a courthouse corridor